You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Risk-Taking by Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) Pelvic Phenotypes: Does Morphology Predict Behaviour?
Tamara C. Grand
Vol. 137, No. 7/8, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Stickleback Behaviour and Evolution (Jul. - Aug., 2000), pp. 889-906
Published by: Brill
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4535746
Page Count: 18
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Predators, Phenotypes, Predation, Fish, Girdles, Priests, Animal morphology, Foraging, Experimentation, Public aquariums
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The relationship between risk-taking behaviour and anti-predator morphology was studied in benthic threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from Paxton and Priest Lakes on Texada Island, British Columbia, Canada. In general, Priest Lake benthics possess complete pelvic girdles and numerous lateral plates. In contrast, Paxton Lake benthics exhibit an apparent polymorphism in anti-predator morphology; some individuals possess complete pelvic girdles while others lack them entirely. Although phenotypes tended to differ in their willingness to risk exposure to a trout predator while foraging, the predicted positive relationship between risk-taking behaviour and anti-predator morphology was not observed. While 'girdled' Paxton individuals were more willing to forage in the vicinity of the predator than 'girdleless' Paxton individuals, the more heavily armoured Priest fish were intermediate in their risk-taking behaviour. These results suggest that the relationship between risk-taking behaviour and anti-predator morphology may be influenced by differences between phenotypes in predation regime and life history.
Behaviour © 2000 Brill