You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Freud's Own Blend: Functional Analysis, Idiographic Explanation, and the Extension of Ordinary Psychology
Neil C. Manson
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
New Series, Vol. 103 (2003), pp. 179-195
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4545391
Page Count: 17
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Psychology, Dreams, Cognitive psychology, Motivation, Mind, Philosophical psychology, Psychoanalysis, Thirst, Rationality, Analytics
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
If we are to understand why psychoanalysis extends ordinary psychology in the precise ways that it does, we must take account of the existence of, and the interplay between, two distinct kinds of explanatory concern: functional and idiographic. The form and content of psychoanalytic explanation and its unusual methodology can, at least in part, be viewed as emerging out of Freud's attempt to reconcile these two types of explanatory concern. We must also acknowledge the role of the background theoretical context that shapes Freud's functional thinking about the mind. A neglect of the role of the background theory in shaping the extension of ordinary psychology leaves us with puzzles about the nature and direction of the psychoanalytic extension and gives rise to an unbelievable history of psychoanalysis.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society © 2003 The Aristotelian Society