You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Formulation of Disjunctivism: A Response to Fish
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
New Series, Vol. 105 (2005), pp. 129-141
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4545430
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Disjunctivism, Perceptual experiences, Naive realism, Perception theory, Visual perception, Epistemology, Logical disjunction, Aristotelianism, Children, Perception
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Fish proposes that we need to elucidate what 'disjunctivism' stands for, and he also proposes that it stands for the rejection of a principle about the nature of experience that he calls the decisiveness principle. The present paper argues that his first proposal is reasonable, but then argues, in Section II, that his positive suggestion does not draw the line between disjunctivism and non-disjunctivism in the right place. In Section III, it is argued that disjunctivism is a thesis about the special nature of perceptual experience, and the thesis as elucidated here is then distinguished from and related to certain other ideas about perception, namely, direct realism and also McDowell's epistemological disjunctivism.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society © 2005 The Aristotelian Society