Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Nestling Provisioning in Polygynous Great Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus): Do Males Bring Larger Prey to Compensate for Fewer Nest Visits?

Douglas Sejberg, Staffan Bensch and Dennis Hasselquist
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Vol. 47, No. 4 (Mar., 2000), pp. 213-219
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4601734
Page Count: 7
  • Download ($43.95)
  • Cite this Item
Nestling Provisioning in Polygynous Great Reed Warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus): Do Males Bring Larger Prey to Compensate for Fewer Nest Visits?
Preview not available

Abstract

Most studies of social polygyny in birds have examined male provisioning on the basis of the number of feeding visits. This may be misleading if males compensate for infrequent visits by bringing larger prey at each visit. We investigated nestling provisioning in the socially polygynous great reed warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus, in south Central Sweden in 1996-1997. We collected data on rate of feeding visits, prey size and the amount of biomass delivered by males and females. Males had lower rates of feeding visits and provided smaller prey to nestlings in secondary than in monogamous and primary nests. Secondary females had higher rates of feeding visits and brought larger prey than monogamous and primary females. These results confirm that secondary females face a potential cost of polygyny through a lower rate of male feeding, and that this cost was reinforced by the significantly lower male provisioning rate (biomass h-1) at secondary nests. Secondary females compensated for the lack of male assistance by increasing their rate of feeding and bringing larger prey. As a result, offspring in nests of secondary females received as much food as did those in nests of primary females. Prey load size increased with the parent's proportion of feeding visits, suggesting that parents use different feeding strategies depending on their amount of responsibility for nestling provisioning. We suggest that parents which take the main responsibility for nestling feeding have to forage further away from the nest, and based on optimal-foraging theory, they should then on average bring larger prey to their nest.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
[213]
    [213]
  • Thumbnail: Page 
214
    214
  • Thumbnail: Page 
215
    215
  • Thumbnail: Page 
216
    216
  • Thumbnail: Page 
217
    217
  • Thumbnail: Page 
218
    218
  • Thumbnail: Page 
219
    219