You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Estimating Efficacy in a Proposed Randomized Trial with Initial and Later Non-Compliance
Stuart G. Baker, Constantine Frangakis and Karen S. Lindeman
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics)
Vol. 56, No. 2 (2007), pp. 211-221
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4626762
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Walking, Random allocation, Sample size, Health outcomes, Statism, Experimentation, Inference, Estimation methods, Clinical trials, Statistical estimation
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A controversial topic in obstetrics is the effect of walking on the probability of Caesarean section among women in labour. A major reason for the controversy is the presence of non-compliance that complicates the estimation of efficacy, the effect of treatment received on outcome. The intent-to-treat method does not estimate efficacy, and estimates of efficacy that are based directly on treatment received may be biased because they are not protected by randomization. However, when non-compliance occurs immediately after randomization, the use of a potential outcomes model with reasonable assumptions has made it possible to estimate efficacy and still to retain the benefits of randomization to avoid selection bias. In this obstetrics application, non-compliance occurs initially and later in one arm. Consequently some parameters cannot be uniquely estimated without making strong assumptions. This difficulty is circumvented by a new study design involving an additional randomization group and a novel potential outcomes model (principal stratification).
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) © 2007 Royal Statistical Society