You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
High-Frequency Hearing Loss in Male Farmers of Missouri
J. W. Thelin, D. J. Joseph, W. E. Davis, D. E. Baker and M. C. Hosokawa
Public Health Reports (1974-)
Vol. 98, No. 3 (May - Jun., 1983), pp. 268-273
Published by: Sage Publications, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4627424
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Support personnel, Auditory perception, Hearing loss, Age groups, High frequency hearing loss, Functional hearing loss, Noise induced hearing loss, Experimental farms, Livestock farms, Farm tractors
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Farmers are exposed to noise that is potentially hazardous to hearing. We measured the hearing of 161 male farmers and 75 male nonfarmers at the 1979 Missouri Farmers Association Agri-Fair and compared it with the hearing of 129 office workers from central Missouri. Fixed-level screening tests were conducted in both ears at three stimulus frequencies: 1000 and 2000 hertz at 20 decibels hearing level and 4000 hertz at 25 decibels hearing level. Audiometers were calibrated in accordance with the ANSI--1969 standard. The results show that farmers are at risk for hearing loss at 2000 and 4000 hertz when compared with office workers. The prevalence of hearing loss was greater for farmers at both frequencies in every decade age group from 25 to 64 years. Using screening failure at 2000 and 4000 hertz in both ears as a criterion for a loss that would affect communication ability, we found that the failure rate was 16.8 percent for farmers and 6.2 percent for office workers. As other investigators have found, the prevalence of high-frequency hearing loss in male nonfarmers who associate with farmers was nearly as great as for farmers.
Public Health Reports (1974-) © 1983 Sage Publications, Inc.