You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Feeding Behaviour and Foraging Strategies of Captive Phyllostomid Fruit Bats: An Experimental Study
Frank J. Bonaccorso and Thomas J. Gush
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 56, No. 3 (Oct., 1987), pp. 907-920
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4956
Page Count: 14
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Bats, Fruits, Foraging, Animal feeding behavior, Species, Food, Forest canopy, Plant ecology, Biological taxonomies, Synecology
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Feeding rhythms, rates, and fruit selectivity were observed in flight cage experiments involving seven species of frugivorous bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) from two distinct foraging guilds: canopy frugivores specializing on superabundant fruits of canopy trees and groundstorey frugivores specializing on fruits of shrubs and understorey trees of low fecundity. (2) Bat species differed in handling times of individual fruits, feeding rhythms, and fruit species selectivity with groups of bat species corresponding to previously defined guilds. Canopy frugivores fed continuously throughout most of the night and ate each fruit slowly. Groundstorey frugivores fed in a series of discontinuous bouts separated by periods of roosting/sleeping and ate individual fruits rapidly. (3) Bat species differed in cumulative food item feeding rates over 2-4 h experimental periods, but species subsets did not correspond to established guilds. (4) Paired fruit choice tests showed that captive bats selected fruits that wild populations of their species commonly eat. Groundstorey frugivores selected fruits high in nutrient content. Canopy frugivores selected familiar fruits of low nutrient content over nutritionally higher quality fruits that wild conspecifics rarely eat. (5) Exploitation competition for some limited food resources is discussed as a possible mechanism that has led to resource partitioning and foraging specialization in neotropical bat communities.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1987 British Ecological Society