You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
A Model of Sympatric Speciation by Sexual Selection
George F. Turner and Michael T. Burrows
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 260, No. 1359 (Jun. 22, 1995), pp. 287-292
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/50188
Page Count: 6
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Speciation, Mating behavior, Alleles, Phenotypic traits, Sexual selection, Female animals, Species, Freshwater fishes, Evolution, Sympatric species
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Quantitative genetic models have indicated that sexual selection may lead to speciation in isolated populations or to exaggeration of differences in male traits along a cline. We argue that where female mate preference and opposing natural selection against conspicuous males have produced a stable equilibrium in male trait genotype, a reversed female mate preference may invade the population, initially assisted by reduced male mortality. The consequent linkage disequilibrium may lead to rapid sympatric speciation. Assuming a four-locus quantitative male trait and single-locus female preference rule and overlapping generations, we present a simulation model which indicates that reversal of female mate preference in a single individual can lead rapidly to full reproductive isolation in a small population. Speciation may be produced by the proposed mechanism in allopatry, parapatry or full sympatry. We suggest that differences in mating system and its genetic bases may account for some of the differences in speciation rates among lineages.
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 1995 Royal Society