You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Nuclear DNA Content and Floral Evolution in Silene latifolia
Thomas R. Meagher and Denise E. Costich
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 263, No. 1376 (Nov. 22, 1996), pp. 1455-1460
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/50386
Page Count: 6
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Nuclear DNA content shows extensive intraspecific variation in plants, attributable to changes in levels of repetitive DNA. Since its discovery, repetitive DNA often has been regarded as `junk' or selfish DNA with little or no evolutionary significance at the individual level, except possibly a deleterious role stemming from its over-replication. However, recent works have pointed out that repetitive DNA may have an important impact on phenotypic selection through local or general modifications of gene expression. Phenotypic evolution has typically been studied using quantitative genetic techniques that treat underlying genetic effects as variance components. In previous work, we identified an among population negative correlation between nuclear DNA content variation, attributable to repetitive DNA, and calyx diameter, a phenotypic character with obvious ecological importance, in Silene latifolia. In the present study, we established a negative genetic relation between an AT-biased flow cytometric measure of nuclear DNA content and calyx diameter across lineages that had been subjected to selection for increases or decreases in calyx diameter. This finding suggests that new attention should be directed toward repetitive DNA as a basis for phenotypic variation and evolution.
Proceedings: Biological Sciences © 1996 Royal Society