You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Skopas and the Pothos
American Journal of Archaeology
Vol. 91, No. 3 (Jul., 1987), pp. 411-420
Published by: Archaeological Institute of America
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/505362
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Statues, Terracotta, Draperies, Sculptors, Art museums, Torso, Parataxis, Arm, Bronzes, Arias
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The so-called Pothos by Skopas is usually restored as leaning on a staff-like object, but any such restoration results in a pose far more unbalanced than can be paralleled in Greek art. The original must have leaned on a companion, thus forming part of a paratactic two-figure group; the other figure was certainly Aphrodite, whatever the precise identity of "Pothos." The Roman taste for statues of youthful nude males could explain the selective copying. Other examples of such selective copying are mentioned in this paper. It is also argued here that paratactic two-figure groups possibly existed in fourth century B. C. sculpture, and that the identification of the original as Skopas's Pothos for Samothrace may therefore be the correct one. Stylistic evidence for this claim is discussed.
American Journal of Archaeology © 1987 Archaeological Institute of America