You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Population Dynamics of Cinnabar Moth and Ragwort in Grassland
M. J. Crawley and M. P. Gillman
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 58, No. 3 (Oct., 1989), pp. 1035-1050
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/5140
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Plants, Eggs, Moths, Female animals, Mortality, Insect larvae, Caterpillars, Population dynamics, Instars, Flowering
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
(1) Population densities of ragwort Senecio jacobaea (Compositae) and cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae (Arctiidae) were studied in mesic grasslands at Silwood Park from 1981 to 1988. The host plant fluctuated 13-fold in population density; the insect fluctuated 8-fold in adult female density and 9-fold in egg batch density. (2) Realized fecundity of cinnabar moth was density-independent at 3.3 egg batches per female, less than 67% of potential fecundity based on pupal dissection. Larval survival depended on the ragwort shoot biomass available at oviposition and the mean size and spacing of plants; emigration began earlier from small plants, and density-dependent mortality occurred during dispersal. Survival was low when spring was late and plants were small at oviposition, when egg batch density was high and fewer plants were available during larval dispersal, and after years of high flowering when the larger, flowering rosettes died back. (3) Plant recruitment was not related to flower production or moth abundance in the previous year, and may be microsite limited. Additional seeds produced no increase in plant density and there was no large seed bank. Weather and rabbit disturbance influenced plant recruitment from seed and from perennating rootstocks of large plants. Defoliation did not increase plant death rate. Seedling abundance did not peak following years of peak ragwort seed production. (4) The key factors of ragwort-cinnabar moth interaction appeared to be autumn and spring rainfall and the timing of spring growth. Autumn and spring rains encouraged ragwort growth, and caused insect abundance to peak 1 year after host biomass. Early spring growth, and large plants at egg-laying, reduced larval competition. (5) The interaction between the plant and herbivore is asymmetric. As in other plant communities, cinnabar moth is food-limited, but in mesic grasslands ragwort biomass is not herbivore-limited, and the plant behaves as an iteroparous perennial.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1989 British Ecological Society