If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Biases in Sperm Use in the Mallard: No Evidence for Selection by Females Based on Sperm Genotype

Emma J. A. Cunningham and Kimberly M. Cheng
Proceedings: Biological Sciences
Vol. 266, No. 1422 (May 7, 1999), pp. 905-910
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/51468
Page Count: 6
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Biases in Sperm Use in the Mallard: No Evidence for Selection by Females Based on Sperm Genotype
Preview not available

Abstract

If we are to understand fully the factors influencing fertilization success, it is essential to untangle male and female effects on sperm use. In many species, differences in fertilizing ability have been found between males or male genotypes, but the impact of female effects is less clear and may vary between taxa. Here, we examine sperm use in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), a species of bird in which forced copulation forms a major component of the mating system, to investigate whether there is any evidence for post-insemination female choice or rejection of particular sperm genotypes. Current models of sperm use in birds suggest observed patterns of paternity are a result of passive sperm loss from the reproductive tract and the relative timing of inseminations. Although this type of model successfully predicted average values of last male precedence observed in this species, there was considerable variation between females in their pattern of sperm use, with a tendency for females to use sperm of a single genotype. However, females did not consistently prefer one genotype over another in repeated inseminations with identical sperm mixtures, suggesting that post-insemination female preference based on sperm genotype did not account for this variation.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
905
    905
  • Thumbnail: Page 
906
    906
  • Thumbnail: Page 
907
    907
  • Thumbnail: Page 
908
    908
  • Thumbnail: Page 
909
    909
  • Thumbnail: Page 
910
    910