You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sexual Dimorphism and Niche Divergence: Feeding Habits of the Arafura Filesnake
Darryl Houston and Richard Shine
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 62, No. 4 (Oct., 1993), pp. 737-748
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/5393
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Snakes, Taxa, Female animals, Fish, Fyke nets, Sexual dimorphism, Sex linked differences, Rainy seasons, Dry seasons, Species
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
1. Sex-based differences in diets are widespread among animals, but may often reflect sex differences in body size or in the times and places that feeding occurs, rather than sex-specific prey-selection behaviour. We examined these hypotheses with detailed information on the types and sizes of fishes consumed by filesnakes, Acrochordus arafurae McDowell, 1979, based on a 4-year field study in the Wet-Dry tropics of northern Australia. 2. These aquatic snakes show extreme sexual dimorphism in body length, body shape, relative head size, head shape, foraging habitat and diet. The composition of the diet varied seasonally and with the size as well as the gender of the snakes. Both sexes ate more frequently during the Wet season, apparently because of higher prey availability at this time. 3. Both sexes showed significant selectivity of prey species, but differed profoundly in food habits. Female filesnakes generally consumed only a single large prey item at a time, whereas the stomachs of males typically contained many small prey items. 4. Males were relatively unselective foragers, with little evidence of ontogenetic shifts in prey size or prey type. In contrast, large females ate larger prey items, and showed an ontogenetic shift from a generalized (male-like) diet to `sleepy cod' (eleotrids) and finally to plotosid catfish. 5. When comparison was restricted to snakes of the same head length, males and females differed significantly in dietary composition and in prey sizes, but not in feeding frequencies or the relative numbers of snakes containing single versus multiple prey items.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1993 British Ecological Society