Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support

Energetics: The Costs of Living and Reproducing for an Individual Cephalopod

Martin J. Wells and Andrew Clarke
Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences
Vol. 351, No. 1343, The Role of Cephalopods in the World's Oceans (Aug. 29, 1996), pp. 1083-1104
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/56297
Page Count: 22
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Cite this Item
If you need an accessible version of this item please contact JSTOR User Support
Energetics: The Costs of Living and Reproducing for an Individual Cephalopod
Preview not available

Abstract

Cephalopods, like all other animals, have to decide how to allocate resources; maintenance processes, growth of somatic and reproductive tissues, and locomotor activity all have costs. We should like to be able to identify these costs and discover how efficiently cephalopods make use of the prey that they capture and digest. Cephalopods generally grow fast and mature rapidly; a first task is to determine how accurately laboratory studies reflect growth in the wild, because much of the information we need (such as food conversion efficiencies, excretion rates or the costs of locomotion) can be collected only from animals kept in the laboratory. Comparison of laboratory feeding and growth rates for octopods, sepioids and teuthoids with fisheries data suggests that data collected from cephalopods fed ad libitum in the laboratory may be used validly to construct energy budgets representative of individuals in the wild. The immediate cost of feeding (the specific dynamic action) has been thoroughly documented in Octopus, as has the longer-term elevation or depression of metabolic rate by feeding or starvation; it is assumed that similar costs will be found in squid. The cost of locomotion has been studied in both octopods and squid, but we have only limited data on how much time the animals spend moving, and how rapidly, in the wild. Excretory and faecal losses are assessed from laboratory studies, and maintenance costs estimated from feeding rates that just maintain body mass in the laboratory. Comparison of gross and net food conversion efficiencies suggest that squid convert food into tissues less efficiently than octopods, owing primarily to their greater time spent in locomotion. We present a representative series of energy budgets for octopods (based on Octopus) and squids (based on Illex and Loligo), for starving, feeding, migrating and maturing individuals. A major contrast is provided by Nautilus, which lives for ten or twenty years and grows only slowly. Finally we speculate on the possible biochemical and historical factors that may have limited the adaptive radiation of cephalopods, resulting in a group lacking herbivores, detritivores or filter-feeders but extremely successful as carnivores.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1083
    1083
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1084
    1084
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1085
    1085
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1086
    1086
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1087
    1087
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1088
    1088
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1089
    1089
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1090
    1090
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1091
    1091
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1092
    1092
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1093
    1093
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1094
    1094
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1095
    1095
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1096
    1096
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1097
    1097
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1098
    1098
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1099
    1099
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1100
    1100
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1101
    1101
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1102
    1102
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1103
    1103
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1104
    1104