You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
Style Issues and Vote Choice
James E. Campbell and Kenneth John Meier
Vol. 1, No. 3 (Autumn, 1979), pp. 203-215
Published by: Springer
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/586371
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Political candidates, Voting, Political science, Saliency, Rational choice theory, Ambiguity, Political corruption, Presidential elections, Public opinion, Government spending
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
It has been an assumption common in voting research that candidates must offer and voters must perceive opposing stands on issues for those issues to have a rational influence on the vote. Though apparently reasonable, this assumption eliminates analysis of the rational impact of style in voter thinking. This article argues that style issues should not be so easily dismissed and were of some importance in the 1972 presidential election. First, the data indicate that voters considered style issues as important as position issues. Second, voters were able to detect differences between the candidates on certain style issues. Third, salient style issues and salient position issues are similar in their causal relationship to the vote. These findings lend support to the general conclusion that style issues are an important and rational element of voter deliberations and have several implications for the study of public opinion, the behavior of political leaders, and the adequacy of elections as mechanisms of governmental accountability.
Political Behavior © 1979 Springer