You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Phylogenies for Ecologists
Paul H. Harvey
Journal of Animal Ecology
Vol. 65, No. 3 (May, 1996), pp. 255-263
Published by: British Ecological Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/5872
Page Count: 9
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Preview not available
1. Molecular genetic information is becoming widely available and can reveal when (in relative or absolute time) pairs of individuals within a species or pairs of higher-level taxa last shared a common ancestor. 2. Such genealogical or phylogenetic information is usually ignored by ecologists when performing cross-taxonomic analyses, probably because ecological and evolutionary time-scales are considered to be very different. 3. Whenever ecologists attempt to understand which traits or characteristics allow different taxa to be successful in different ecological circumstances, phylogenetic information should be incorporated into their analyses whether the data are experimental or observational. Closely related species share many traits in addition to those responsible for ecological success in particular circumstances, and phylogenetically controlled analyses help to eliminate the effects of such confounding variables. 4. When genealogical information is available showing when, in relative time, a sample of individuals from a population or species last shared a common ancestor, it is often possible to infer the population dynamic history. In particular, some modes of population change (e.g. linear or exponential growth, population stasis, population decline) can be shown to provide a much better fit the data than others. 5. Phylogenetic analysis can show the relative extent to which new species evolve into vacant niches rather than partition old niches.
Journal of Animal Ecology © 1996 British Ecological Society