You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Fundamentals of Grammatology
Peter T. Daniels
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Vol. 110, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1990), pp. 727-731
Published by: American Oriental Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/602899
Page Count: 5
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A very influential suggestion in I. J. Gelb's Study of Writing concerns the nature of the West Semitic scripts. Usually thitherto called "alphabets," the Hebrew, Phoenician, etc., scripts are for Gelb "syllabaries" whose characters have values like bx; a corollary is that the Ethiopian script is not a syllabary but an alphabet. While this notion has been widely adopted, it remains counter-intuitive. A recent suggestion of P. Swiggers-to distinguish between "denoting" and "standing for" a syllable-helps to clarify Gelb's thinking but does not alleviate the terminological difficulties. A characteristic of Gelb's work in many fields may account for his view of the evolution of writing systems and seems to have led to the mischaracterization of some scripts noted by previous commentators. Here a typology of scripts is proposed that recognizes both a new type intermediate between syllabary and alphabet and a fundamental distinction between two kinds of syllabary.
Journal of the American Oriental Society © 1990 American Oriental Society