Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Imagining Matriarchy: "Kingdoms of Women" in Tang China

Jennifer W. Jay
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Vol. 116, No. 2 (Apr. - Jun., 1996), pp. 220-229
DOI: 10.2307/605697
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/605697
Page Count: 10
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($8.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Imagining Matriarchy: "Kingdoms of Women" in Tang China
Preview not available

Abstract

Traditional Chinese sources designated certain self-contained societies as "kingdoms of women" either on the grounds that no men were present in the population or that women served as heads of state. This paper seeks to identify and discuss the kingdoms of women as known in Tang China under two categories: (1) mythical kingdoms constructed by legend and imagination, and (2) historical kingdoms, located in western Tibet, Japan, and Korea, which did, in fact, interact with Tang China. In the light of current views on matriarchy, only the Chinese characterization of the Tibetan kingdom before the eighth century might be understood as pointing to a true matriarchy, in terms of female rule, matrilineal succession, and matrilocal residence. Despite the nearly contemporary reigns of China's only female "emperor," Wu Zetian, Silla Korea's three ruling queens, and Yamato/Nara Japan's halfdozen empresses, none of these "kingdoms of women" can be understood as matriarchies, because women, in general, did not play a dominant role in the state or society.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
220
    220
  • Thumbnail: Page 
221
    221
  • Thumbnail: Page 
222
    222
  • Thumbnail: Page 
223
    223
  • Thumbnail: Page 
224
    224
  • Thumbnail: Page 
225
    225
  • Thumbnail: Page 
226
    226
  • Thumbnail: Page 
227
    227
  • Thumbnail: Page 
228
    228
  • Thumbnail: Page 
229
    229