You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Space for Class? On Class Analysis in the Study of Gentrification
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
Vol. 20, No. 2 (1995), pp. 236-247
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/622434
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
A call for the consistent application of class analysis to the issue of gentrification. Acknowledging the continued primacy of work in class structuration, the paper concentrates on the determinations between class and residence at three levels of abstraction (mode of production; social formation; conjuncture). Three critical moments of the realization of class relations are identified at the three levels of abstraction: between speculator-developers and all inner-urban residents as gentrification is 'sanctioned' as a form of revalorization; petit-bourgeois entrepreneurial and rentier activity within the social formation; and, exceptionally, class action between middle-class and working-class residents. A full appreciation of the multiple determinations of class on gentrification and the effect of residence on class constitution must incorporate labour-market and workplace relations as well as an expanded view of residence to encompass the whole metropolitan area. The complex and contradictory realizations of the class relation posited by this method of abstraction reveal a robustness and subtlety which make it a more a promising basis than recent non-essentialist contributions for the retheorization of class and space.
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers © 1995 The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)