You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Sexual Division of Labor in Agriculture
Michael L. Burton and Douglas R. White
New Series, Vol. 86, No. 3 (Sep., 1984), pp. 568-583
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/678338
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Livestock farms, Female animals, Division of labor, Food crops, Domesticated animals, Population density, Plows, Subsistence farming, Intensive husbandry, Intensive production
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Female agricultural contributions decline with agricultural intensification. We formulate and test a theory of the processes of agricultural intensification that explains a high proportion of the variance in female contributions to agriculture. Five variables show replicable effects across two or more regions of the world. These are number of dry months, importance of domesticated animals to subsistence, use of the plow, crop type, and population density. Of these, the first two are the most powerful predictors of female agricultural contributions, while population density has only very weak effects
American Anthropologist © 1984 American Anthropological Association