You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Mediating Nationalism and Archaeology: A Matter of Trust?
Sandra A. Scham
Vol. 100, No. 2 (Jun., 1998), pp. 301-308
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/683112
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Biblical archaeology, Archaeological paradigms, Beneficiaries, Property trusts, Nationalism, Cultural anthropology, Archaeological sites, Archaeological excavation, Trusteeship, Anthropology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Recognizing that the past is a property of value, archaeologists have traditionally presented themselves as "trustees" of that property. Yet they have in fact become contractors who try to divorce themselves from the consequences of their work. The two roles are very different, and there is much to be gained from re-creating the idea of archaeological trusteeship. A trustee is a disinterested protector of property for the beneficiaries; a contractor is responsible only to the signatories to the contract and has no impartial obligations. Recognizing the distinction is crucial to the argument that archaeologists can "make a difference" in how cultural property is negotiated.
American Anthropologist © 1998 American Anthropological Association