You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
The Effects of Teaching Euclidean Geometry via Transformations on Student Achievement and Attitudes in Tenth-Grade Geometry
Zalman P. Usiskin
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
Vol. 3, No. 4 (Nov., 1972), pp. 249-259
Published by: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/748492
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Geometry, Mathematics, High school students, Mathematics teachers, Mathematical transformations, Mathematics education, Students, Mathematical congruence, Similarity theorem, Teachers
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Materials were written for an entire year's course in geometry in which transformations were used to develop the concepts of congruence, similarity, and symmetry, as well as being a vehicle for proof. This paper presents a study involving 413 students using these materials and 483 control students, comparing performance on standard geometry content and attitudes. Preliminary studies were done on perceptual, arithmetic, and algebraic skills. Student comprehension of transformation-related concepts, the problem of implementation, and attitudes of teachers were informally studied. While the data indicated that the experimental Ss could learn the material, few differences were detected with the measures employed--a significant difference (
$p<.01$) in favor of the C group was found on the posttest of standard geometry content. Pre- (September) and posttest (June) student attitude data indicated a change in mean score, less positive, for both E and C groups ( $p<.01$ for the C group). Attitude differences between E and C were not significant. Informal feedback from a teacher questionnaire indicated a favorable reaction to the experimental materials.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education © 1972 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics