You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Food Technology and the Law [and Discussion]
G. A. H. Elton and W. H. Nightingale
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
Vol. 191, No. 1102, A Discussion on Food Technology in the 1980s (Nov. 18, 1975), pp. 99-110
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/76909
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Food law, Food, Food additives, Food contamination, Food consumption, Food safety, Food security, Additives, Contaminants, Meats
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Early food laws were developed mainly to protect the customer against short weight and fraud; present-day food laws are designed to ensure (a) that the customer is not misled; (b) that food is safe to eat; and (c) to provide nutritional standards for some basic foodstuffs. The principles of protecting the consumer against deception are fairly straightforward, even if the practice is sometimes complex. In relation to food safety, one must consider not only short-term toxic effects, but long-term effects, including possible carcinogenesis. Many substances which occur naturally in foods are toxic to some extent; furthermore, food may become contaminated during agricultural production, harvesting, processing and distribution; or substances traditionally added to food may prove to have deleterious effects. Legislation must be able to take account of relevant scientific information at short notice. It is also necessary to keep under review any developments in food technology which might materially affect the nutrient content of the diet of the average person or of special groups. The paper discusses some possible effects of future changes in food technology, food consumption patterns and consumer attitudes, and considers some aspects of research which may be relevant to future legislation.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences © 1975 Royal Society