The Effect of the Federal Safety Appliance Acts on Workmen's Compensation

The Yale Law Journal
Vol. 30, No. 7 (May, 1921), pp. 732-735
DOI: 10.2307/788289
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/788289
Page Count: 4
  • Download PDF
  • Cite this Item

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

The Effect of the Federal Safety Appliance Acts on Workmen's Compensation
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.

Notes and References

This item contains 17 references.

[Footnotes]
  • 1
    This reference contains 3 citations:
    • Act of March 2, I893 (27 Stat. at L. 531)
    • Act of March 2, I903 (32 Stat. at L. 943)
    • Act of April I4, I9IO (36 Stat. at L. 299).
  • 2
    Ross v. Schooley (i9'9, C. C. A. 7th) 257 Fed. 9o.
  • 3
    Director General of Railroads v. Ronald (i920, C. C. A. 2d) 265 Fed. I38, i44.
  • 4
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. White (19I7) 243 U. S. i88, 20I, 37 Sup. Ct. 247, 252
  • 5
    Knowlton v. Moore (i900) 178 U. S. 41, 77, 20 Sup. Ct. 747, 76I
  • 6
    Texas & Pacific Jy. v. Rigsby (i9i6) 24I U. S. 33, 4I, 36 Sup. Ct. 842
  • 7
    Murray v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. (i894, N. D. Iowa) 62 Fed. 24, 42.
  • 8
    Smith v. Alabama (i888) i24 U. S. 465, 478, 8 Sup. Ct. 564, 569
  • 10
    United States v. Ferger (I919) 250 U. S. 199, 39 Sup. Ct. 445.
  • 11
    Smith v. Alabama, supra note 9, at p. 477
  • 12
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. Tonsellito (1917) 244 U. S. 360, 362, 37 Sup. Ct. 620, 62i
  • 13
    Postal Tel. Co. v. Warren (I919) 251 U. S. 27, 40 Sup. Ct. 69.
  • 14
    This reference contains 6 citations:
    • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Haber (i898) i69 U. S. 6I3, i8 Sup. Ct. 488
    • Reid v. Colorado (i902) i87 U. S. 137, 23 Sup. Ct. 92
    • Savage v. Jones (I9I2) 225 U. S. 501, 32 Sup. Ct. 7I5
    • Atlantic Coast Line Ry. v. Georgia (1914) 234 U. S. 280, 34 Sup. Ct. 82
    • Missouri, K. & T. Ry. v. Haber, supra
    • Savage v. Jones, supra
  • 15
    N. Y. Central Ry. v. White, supra note 4.
  • 16
    Pennsylvania Ry. v. Hughes (1903) 191 U. S. 477, 488, 24 Sup. Ct. 132, 135
  • 17
    Ross v. Schooley, supra note 2.
  • 18
    Brandeis, J., dissenting, in N. Y. Central Ry. v. Winfield (09I7) 244 U. S. 147, i68, 37 Sup. Ct. 546, 555.