You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Gatekeepers and the Social Control of Social Research
Robert S. Broadhead and Ray C. Rist
Vol. 23, No. 3 (Feb., 1976), pp. 325-336
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/799778
Page Count: 12
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Increasing concern has been expressed over the way sponsorship of research by various governmental agencies and private foundations has influenced the "objectivity" of scientific investigations. Actual manifestations of the social control of research can be studied through an analysis of the role of the "gatekeeper." Gatekeeping influences the research endeavor in a number of ways: by limiting conditions of entry, by defining the problem area of study, by limiting access to data and respondents, by restricting the scope of analysis, and by retaining prerogatives with respect to publication. Strategies are not well developed for managing pressures of gatekeeping. Furthermore, the location of researchers within university settings mitigates against confrontation with gatekeepers, particularly if the research effort is directed toward elites or powerful institutions. Where institutions such as universities agree with gatekeepers that proposed sensitive and critical research would be "inappropriate," researchers must create autonomous positions from which to conduct their research.
Social Problems © 1976 Oxford University Press