You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
From Pressure Group to Social Movement: Organizational Dilemmas of the Effort to Promote Nuclear Power
Bert Useem and Mayer N. Zald
Vol. 30, No. 2 (Dec., 1982), pp. 144-156
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/800514
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Social movements, Nuclear power, Nuclear power industry, Energy, Electric power industry, Construction industries, Polities, Electric utility industry, Industrial management, Farming communities
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Social movement theorists have focused on the efforts groups make to gain the right to routinely influence government policy, while ignoring the opposite process, in which groups lose this right. This paper examines the development of the pronuclear movement in the United States as a case study of a pressure group which lost power and mobilized a social movement to restore it. The antinuclear movement helped to dislodge the pronuclear pressure group. We describe two wings of the pronuclear movement, an industry-based wing and a community-based wing, and look at the different organizational and strategic problems these two bases of mobilization gave rise to.
Social Problems © 1982 Oxford University Press