You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
U. S. Defense Spending under the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, 1986-1989
Sung Deuk Hahm, Mark S. Kamlet and David C. Mowery
Public Administration Review
Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. - Feb., 1992), pp. 8-15
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/976541
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Defense spending, Simulations, Federal budget deficit, United States federal budget, Federal budgets, Procurement, Coefficients, Financial budgets, Modeling, Economic models
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
How did the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act (GRH) impact on U. S. defense spending? Focusing on defense spending from 1986-1989, Sung Deuk Hahm, Mark Kamlet, and David Mowery found defense spending to be lower than it would have been without GRH. GRH partially, but not completely, returned defense spending priorities and defense-fiscal policy linkages to their pre-Reagan status. GRH restrained expenditures by a similar percentage in all of the functional defense categories except one-the politically sensitive areas of research, development, test and evaluation. This finding contrasts with previous studies that found the impacts to be uneven across functional spending categories.
Public Administration Review © 1992 American Society for Public Administration