Access
You are not currently logged in.
Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen Reader
This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.The Response of Laminar Skin Friction and Heat Transfer to Fluctuations in the Stream Velocity
M. J. Lighthill
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Vol. 224, No. 1156 (Jun. 9, 1954), pp. 123
Published by: Royal Society
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/99502
Page Count: 23
 Item Type
 Article
 Thumbnails
 References
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Abstract
The laminar boundary layer in twodimensional flow about a cylindrical body, when the velocity of the oncoming flow relative to the body oscillates in magnitude but not in direction, is analyzed mathematically. It is found that the maxima of skin friction at any point anticipate the maxima of the stream velocity, because the pressure gradient needed to speed up the main stream locally produces a given percentage increase in the slow flow near the wall sooner than it can do so in the main stream itself. For each point on the body surface there is a critical frequency ω 0, such that for frequencies ω > ω 0 the oscillations are to a close approximation ordinary 'shear waves' unaffected by the mean flow; the phase advance in the skin friction is then 45°. For frequencies ω < ω 0, on the other hand, the oscillations are closely approximated as the sum of parts proportional to the instantaneous velocity and acceleration of the oncoming stream; the phase advance in the skin friction is then tan1 (ω /ω 0). The part depending on the instantaneous velocity may be called the quasisteady part of the oscillations. The coefficient of the acceleration of the oncoming stream in the frictional drag of the body may be called the frictional component of the virtual mass. For a flat plate in a stream of speed V, ω 0 = 0· 6 V/x at a distance x from the leading edge. If c is the length of the plate, its transient motion parallel to itself is governed solely by quasisteady forces and this added virtual mass provided that ω c/V < 0· 6. The frictional component of the virtual mass of a flat plate or any thin obstacle is found to be approximately 0· 5 times the mass of the fluid in the boundary layer's 'displacement area'; it is suggested that the coefficient may need to be increased to about 0· 8 for turbulent layers. When the body surface is hot, the maxima in heat transfer from it tend to lag behind those of the stream velocity, as a result of thermal inertia, but this is counteracted to some extent by the effect of convection by the phaseadvanced velocities near the wall. For layers with a favourable gradient in the mean flow, one finds that the tendency to lag predominates. For the Blasius layer, however, the two effects appear to cancel out fairly closely; and for layers with adverse pressure gradient in the main stream there seems to be phase advance at the lower frequencies. At frequencies well above ω 0 there is always a phase lag of 90°, but the amplitude of heattransfer fluctuations is then much reduced, even though that of the skin friction fluctuations is increased. Special attention is paid to the phase lag in the heat transfer from a heated circular wire in a fluctuating stream, in the range of Reynolds number for which a laminar boundary layer exists. Curves for the amplitude and phase of the heattransfer fluctuations as a function of frequency are given in figure 4, from calculations for the layer of nearly uniform thickness, which covers the front quadrant of the wire, and across which most of the fluctuating part of the heat transfer is believed to occur. For frequencies small compared with ω 0 = 20V/d (where d is the diameter), the departure of the heattransfer fluctuations from their quasisteady form consists essentially of a time lag of the order of 0· 2d/V.
Page Thumbnails

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences © 1954 Royal Society