Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

Test Scaling and Value-Added Measurement

Dale Ballou
Education Finance and Policy
Vol. 4, No. 4, Key Issues in Value-Added Modeling (Fall 2009), pp. 351-383
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/educfinapoli.4.4.351
Page Count: 33
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Item Type
Article
References
Test Scaling and Value-Added Measurement
Preview not available

Abstract

Abstract Conventional value-added assessment requires that achievement be reported on an interval scale. While many metrics do not have this property, application of item response theory (IRT) is said to produce interval scales. However, it is difficult to confirm that the requisite conditions are met. Even when they are, the properties of the data that make a test IRT scalable may not be the properties we seek to represent in an achievement scale, as shown by the lack of surface plausibility ofmany scales resulting from the application of IRT. An alternative, ordinal data analysis, is presented. It is shown that value-added estimates are sensitive to the choice of ordinalmethods over conventional techniques. Value-added practitioners should ask themselves whether they are so confident of the metric properties of these scales that they are willing to attribute differences to the superiority of the latter.

Page Thumbnails