With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account?
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Purchase a PDF
How does it work?
- Select the purchase option.
-
Check out using a credit card or bank account with
PayPal . - Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
Abstract This case study reports the feasibility of the Partnership Schools Comprehensive School Reform (CSR) model for school improvement in a Title I elementary school. Interviews were conducted and documents were collected for 3 years to study whether and how the school implemented key policy attributes—specificity, consistency, authority, power, and stability—that have explained the successful implementation of other CSR programs. The data also identified if and how the school implemented essential elements of teamwork, leadership, action plans, implemented activities, evaluation, and networking, which have explained improvements in programs of family and community involvement. With the implementation of the model, the case study school increased the number of families involved in students’ education at school and at home. Longitudinal achievement test scores showed that the CSR school improved the percentage of students attaining proficiency by state standards compared to schools that were matched, one each, for math, reading, and writing. The CSR school also closed its gap in test scores with the district as a whole, despite the fact that the district included several schools in more affluent neighborhoods with higher test scores in the base year. The study revealed a new factor for program development, transitioning, which extends the existing frameworks on program implementation by requiring plans and decisions about continuing a program or parts of it before the end of the CSR grant.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching.
Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
© 2005 by The University of Chicago . All rights reserved.