With a personal account, you can read up to 100 articles each month for free.
Already have an account?
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep
- Access everything in the JPASS collection
- Read the full-text of every article
- Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep
Purchase a PDF
How does it work?
- Select the purchase option.
-
Check out using a credit card or bank account with
PayPal . - Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your account.
Abstract For some time, scholars have argued that migration research has neglected women. The young male migrant in search of wage labor has long been the model actor for demographic, economic, and sociological theories of migration. Through its disregard for women’s roles in migration and migration decisions, this male‐centered scholarship has suggested that women are either passive followers or “left behind” wives. In recent years, scholars from several disciplines have responded to this neglect of women by emphasizing their mobility and their experiences as emigrants in international and internal migration. By and large, these studies have recognized women migrants as agentive. Nevertheless, rural stayers, those apparently left behind by migrant husbands, still receive little attention. This article addresses this lacuna by investigating why it is that women in Ugweno, Tanzania, have remained on their farms while their husbands have migrated out. Through detailed migration histories and in‐depth interviews with a randomly selected group of couples, I explore how the label “left behind” does injustice not only to the ways in which Ugweno women are involved in migration and migration decisions but also to the fact that, for many women, remaining on the rural farm is part of an empowering strategy, offering women a degree of economic autonomy and social well‐being that they would not necessarily have found as migrants.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.Recognized as the leading international journal in women’s studies, Signs is at the forefront of new directions in feminist scholarship. The journal publishes pathbreaking articles, review essays, comparative perspectives, and retrospectives of interdisciplinary interest addressing gender, race, culture, class, nation, and sexuality. Special issue and section topics cover a broad range of geopolitical processes, conditions, and effects; cultural and social configurations; and scholarly and theoretical developments.
Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
© 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.