The only bimonthly academic journal of contemporary Asian affairs published in the US, Asian Survey provides in-depth analysis on contemporary Asia and international affairs. For over forty years, academics, government and security officials, business executives, and journalists have relied on Asian Survey to keep them well informed on a broad spectrum of current Asian issues and developments. Leading American and international scholars provide readers with authoritative reviews and analyses concerning the politics, economics, and foreign relations of countries east of Afghanistan to the Pacific Rim. In each issue, contributors offer valuable "insider perspectives" on important current events, making Asian Survey one of the most widely read and quoted sources for developments in Asia. Scholarly analysis and commentary offer strategies for the future, and timely special issues focus on areas of crisis and change.

Founded in 1893, University of California Press, Journals and Digital Publishing Division, disseminates scholarship of enduring value. One of the largest, most distinguished, and innovative of the university presses today, its collection of print and online journals spans topics in the humanities and social sciences, with concentrations in sociology, musicology, history, religion, cultural and area studies, ornithology, law, and literature. In addition to publishing its own journals, the division also provides traditional and digital publishing services to many client scholarly societies and associations.

This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Asian Survey © 2003 University of California Press
Request Permissions