Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism
Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society
Vol. 48, No. 2 (Spring 2012), pp. 141-168
Published by: Indiana University Press
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.48.2.141
Page Count: 28
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Liberalism, Pragmatism, Liberalization, Feminism, Liberal feminism, Epistemic pluralism, Individualism, Morality, Freedom, Hope
Were these topics helpful?
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
Abstract This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I first analyze four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.
© 2012 Charles S. Peirce Society