Children’s and young adult literature are commonly used in a variety of professional and school settings when addressing challenging and controversial topics such as economic exploitation, gender and sexual diversity, and religion. We argue that since the best of such books are authentic, accurate, approachable, and emotionally engaging, they can also serve similar pedagogical purposes in college classrooms. This article outlines a set of three parallel-structured mixed-methods research and instructional projects that have sought to assess the appeal and effectiveness of books for youth that address three of the most hotly debated political and social controversies of our time: immigrants and migrants, gender and sexual diversity, and Islam and Islamophobia. The instructional and data collection processes are described with commentary on particularly effective or challenging elements. Pre- and post-survey data provide a quantitative backdrop for narrative qualitative data drawn from student interactions, inquiries, and summative reflective essays. With data from over a thousand participants thus far, these projects have yielded substantial findings and publications. The authors have documented ways to address student misconceptions and reactionary pushback, and the central importance of student-to-student interactions in transforming attitudes and dispositions. Particular books, both children’s picture storybooks and young adult novels, have been shown to be especially effective in opening productive conversations regarding tough issues. These projects can serve as a template for other scholars considering their own choices of materials, methods, activities, and pedagogical approaches when introducing critical perspectives into their classrooms.
Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy is a peer-reviewed interdisciplinary forum for pedagogical scholarship exploring intersections of identities, power, and social justice. The journal features a range of approaches, from theoretical articles to creative and experimental accounts of pedagogical innovations, from teachers and scholars from all areas of education. The mission of Transformations is to bridge the gaps between scholarship and teaching, between K-12, higher education, and teaching in non-institutional venues, between the classroom and the world. Transformations provides a community of readers and writers discussing the difficulties, challenges, strategies, anxieties, failures, and successes encountered in the classroom. By emphasizing interdisciplinary and trans-disciplinary approaches, the journal provides teachers in university and other classrooms with tools they can use in their own teaching, and in planning and reflecting on their courses.
Part of the Pennsylvania State University and a division of the Penn State University Libraries and Scholarly Communications, Penn State University Press serves the University community, the citizens of Pennsylvania, and scholars worldwide by advancing scholarly communication in the core liberal arts disciplines of the humanities and social sciences. The Press unites with alumni, friends, faculty, and staff to chronicle the University's life and history. And as part of a land-grant and state-supported institution, the Press develops both scholarly and popular publications about Pennsylvania, all designed to foster a better understanding of the state's history, culture, and environment.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Copyright © 2018 by The Pennsylvania State University. All rights reserved. No copies may be made without the written permission of the publisher.