You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
The Confirmation Process: Law or Politics?
Henry Paul Monaghan
Harvard Law Review
Vol. 101, No. 6 (Apr., 1988), pp. 1202-1212
Published by: The Harvard Law Review Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1341492
Page Count: 11
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Upper houses, Judges, United States Senate, Chief justice, Senators, Government, Supreme Court justices, Political appointments, Political parties, Political partisanship
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Preview not available
In testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, I argued (and still believe) that Judge Robert Bork possessed surpassing qualifications for an appointment to the Supreme Court. Subsequently, I became persuaded that my submission was incomplete. Additional argument was necessary to establish that my testimony, if accepted, imposed a constitutional duty on senators to vote for confirmation. To my surprise, further reflection convinces me that no such argument is possible.
Harvard Law Review © 1988 The Harvard Law Review Association