Eight hundred and thirty-six introductory psychology students completed a 15-page questionnaire relating primarily to religious orientation and background. A factor structure and multiple regression analysis previously reported by Hunsberger (1980) in predicting apostasy was essentially confirmed. An expanded analysis indicated that an intellectual orientation and the emphasis placed on religion in the childhood home were the two factors which served as the best predictors of apostate/nonapostate status in a multiple regression analysis. Further descriptive self-report information indicated that respondents perceived "home" to be a relatively important influence in their religious development. In particular, respondents reported that their parents, especially the mother, had been influential in affecting their religious orientation.
The Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (JSSR), the quarterly publication of the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion, has published research on religious phenomena for over forty years. Drawing on a rich interdisciplinary cross-section of scholarship -- including religion, sociology, political science, psychology, anthropology, and history -- the journal offers scholarly analysis of the role of religion in society. Examples of topics covered include patterns of church membership and growth, the relationship between religion and health, the relationship between religion and social attitudes, the rise of fundamentalism, secularization and sacralization, and new religious movements. JSSR is an important publication for those who desire to keep current with scholarship on the role and impact of religion in today's world.
Wiley is a global provider of content and content-enabled workflow solutions in areas of scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly research; professional development; and education. Our core businesses produce scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly journals, reference works, books, database services, and advertising; professional books, subscription products, certification and training services and online applications; and education content and services including integrated online teaching and learning resources for undergraduate and graduate students and lifelong learners. Founded in 1807, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. has been a valued source of information and understanding for more than 200 years, helping people around the world meet their needs and fulfill their aspirations. Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Wiley has partnerships with many of the world’s leading societies and publishes over 1,500 peer-reviewed journals and 1,500+ new books annually in print and online, as well as databases, major reference works and laboratory protocols in STMS subjects. With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities.
This item is part of JSTOR collection
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
© 1984 Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
Request Permissions
