You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Social Amelioration through Mass Insurgency? A Reexamination of the Piven and Cloward Thesis
Robert B. Albritton
The American Political Science Review
Vol. 73, No. 4 (Dec., 1979), pp. 1003-1011
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1953984
Page Count: 9
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Public assistance programs, Caseloads, Urban areas, Insurgency, Riots, Urban crime, Censuses, Population dynamics, Urban populations, Political science
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Frances Fox Piven and Richard A. Cloward (1971, 1977) have argued that mass insurgency in the United States, occurring especially between 1964 and 1969, produced a series of responses by government, one of the most significant being massive expansion of welfare rolls. Using data on which they base their claim, this study examines the hypothesis that there is a positive association between social disorders and welfare caseload increases. The conclusion is that associations specified by Piven and Cloward are not supported by the data and a plausible rival hypothesis is offered to explain the massive increases in welfare caseloads.
The American Political Science Review © 1979 American Political Science Association