CONTEXT: Obstetrics and gynecology residents who are trained in family planning and intend to provide abortions after residency often do not ultimately do so. The extent of the professional barriers physicians face trying to integrate abortion into their practice is unknown. METHODS: In 2006, in-depth interviews were conducted with 30 obstetrician-gynecologists who had graduated 5-10 years earlier from residency programs that included abortion training. Interviews about physicians' experiences with abortion training and practice were coded and analyzed using a grounded theoretical approach. RESULTS: Eighteen physicians had wanted to offer elective abortions after residency, but only three were doing so at the time of the interview. The majority were unable to provide abortions because of formal and informal policies imposed by their private group practices, employers and hospitals, as well as the strain that doing so might put on relationships with superiors and coworkers. Restrictions on abortion provision sometimes were made explicit when new physicians interviewed for a job, but sometimes became apparent only after they had joined a practice or institution. Several physicians mentioned the threat of violence as an obstacle to providing abortions, but few considered this the greatest deterrent. CONCLUSIONS: The stigma and ideological contention surrounding abortion manifest themselves in professional environments as barriers to the integration of abortion into medical practice. New physicians often lack the professional support and autonomy necessary to offer abortion services.
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (formerly, Family Planning Perspectives) published 1969-2020, provides peer-reviewed, policy-relevant research and analysis on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and other high-income countries. The journal offers research, special reports, commentaries and viewpoint pieces containing unique insights into how reproductive health issues relate to one another, how they are affected by policies and programs, and their implications for individuals and societies.
The Guttmacher Institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the United States and globally.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
© 2010 Guttmacher Institute