The null hypothesis of row-column independence in a two-way contingency table can be expressed as a constraint on the parameters in various standard statistical sampling models. Four sampling models are considered, which are related by nested conditioning. By having the prior distribution in any one model induce the prior distribution in each further conditioned model, it is shown that the Bayes factors for independence will factorize, and there-by expose the evidence residing in the marginal row and column of the table. Bounds on the marginal Bayes factors justify, in a weak sense, Fisher's practice of conditioning. A general theorem is given for factorized Bayes factors from a factorized likelihood function.
Biometrika is primarily a journal of statistics in which emphasis is placed on papers containing original theoretical contributions of direct or potential value in applications. From time to time, papers in bordering fields are published.
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. OUP is the world's largest university press with the widest global presence. It currently publishes more than 6,000 new publications a year, has offices in around fifty countries, and employs more than 5,500 people worldwide. It has become familiar to millions through a diverse publishing program that includes scholarly works in all academic disciplines, bibles, music, school and college textbooks, business books, dictionaries and reference books, and academic journals.
This item is part of JSTOR collection
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Biometrika
© 1974 Biometrika Trust
Request Permissions
