1 The ability of drought-stressed Bouteloua gracilis H.B.K. Lag. ex Steud. to respond rapidly to a small rainfall event with increases in leaf water potential and leaf conductance directed our attention to the role of the roots in these responses. Our first objective was to determine whether new root growth was required to restore the water status to that of a non-stressed plant, following a small rainfall event. The results indicated that surviving roots were able to absorb water at approximately 40% of the rate of new roots, which was sufficient to restore non-stressed leaf water potentials within one day of watering. 2 The second objective was to estimate the rate and amount of new root growth following simulated rainfall events. New root growth occurred approximately 40h after watering. New roots never accounted for more than 15% of total root length but they made possible the continued response to increased water availability. 3 The third objective was to evaluate the importance of previous water stress in the response of Bouteloua gracilis to watering. The response of leaf water potential was influenced by previous water stress as well as by the amount of water added. However, the response of root growth was independent of water stress when 15 mm of water was added and dependent upon water stress in the case of the addition of only 5 mm. 4 A simulation analysis of potential carbon gain, as a result of Bouteloua gracilis responding to a 5-mm rainfall event, suggested that the cost of producing new roots was less than the gain.
Functional Ecology publishes original papers in organismal ecology, including physiological ecology, behavioural ecology and evolutionary ecology, and their implications for community and ecosystem patterns and processes. Papers may describe experimental, comparative or theoretical studies on any type of organism. Work that is purely descriptive, or that focuses on population dynamics (without investigation of the underlying factors influencing population dynamics) will not be accepted unless it sheds light on those specific areas mentioned above. Functional Ecology publishes standard papers, reviews, forum and perspective articles, in addition to special features which are collections of papers on a single theme. The journal is published six times a year. Further details are available at www.functionalecology.org. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of Functional Ecology. The electronic version of Functional Ecology is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117987963/home. Authorized users may be able to access the full text articles at this site.
The British Ecological Society is a welcoming and inclusive home for everyone interested in ecology. The Society was established in 1913 and has over 6,000 members worldwide, bringing people together across regional, national and global scales to advance ecological science. The BES's many activities include the publication of a range of scientific literature, including seven internationally renowned journals, the organisation and sponsorship of a wide variety of meetings, the funding of numerous grant schemes, education work and policy work.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Functional Ecology
© 1987 British Ecological Society