Access

You are not currently logged in.

Access your personal account or get JSTOR access through your library or other institution:

login

Log in to your personal account or through your institution.

If You Use a Screen Reader

This content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.

Phylogenetic Analysis of Artemisia Section Tridentatae (Asteraceae) Based on Sequences from the Internal Transcribed Spacers (ITS) of Nuclear Ribosomal DNA

Amy B. Kornkven, Linda E. Watson and James R. Estes
American Journal of Botany
Vol. 85, No. 12 (Dec., 1998), pp. 1787-1795
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2446513
Page Count: 9
  • Read Online (Free)
  • Download ($12.00)
  • Subscribe ($19.50)
  • Cite this Item
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available

Abstract

Arternisia sect Tridentatae is composed of 11 species of xerophytic shrubs, which dominate much of western North America. Sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA were used to construct a phylogeny, examine circumscription of the section, resolve interspecific relationships, and test competing hypotheses on the origin of the section. The data support the monophyly of sect. Tridentatae, with the exclusion of A. bigelovii and A. palrneri-two historically, anomolous species. However, the ITS data provide insufficient variation to fully resolve interspecific relationships or to support major lineages within the Tridentata clade. Nuclear and chloroplast DNA phylogenies are discordant, which may be a result of interspecific gene flow and subsequent chloroplast capture, particularly related to the placement of A. filifolia and A. californica, in addition to A bigelovii. Furthermore, the ITS data are in conflict with cpDNA data, providing equivocal evidence for competing hypotheses on the Old World vs. New World origin for the section and do not provide support for definitive subgeneric placement.

Page Thumbnails

  • Thumbnail: Page 
1787
    1787
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1788
    1788
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1789
    1789
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1790
    1790
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1791
    1791
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1792
    1792
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1793
    1793
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1794
    1794
  • Thumbnail: Page 
1795
    1795