Your PDF has successfully downloaded.

You may be interested in finding more content on these topics:


You are not currently logged in.

Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:


Log in through your institution.

Journal Article

Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review

Kathleen M. Eisenhardt
The Academy of Management Review
Vol. 14, No. 1 (Jan., 1989), pp. 57-74
Published by: Academy of Management
Stable URL:
Page Count: 18
Were these topics helpful?
See something inaccurate? Let us know!

Select the topics that are inaccurate.

  • Download PDF
  • Add to My Lists
  • Cite this Item
We're having trouble loading this content. Download PDF instead.


Agency theory is an important, yet controversial, theory. This paper reviews agency theory, its contributions to organization theory, and the extant empirical work and develops testable propositions. The conclusions are that agency theory (a) offers unique insight into information systems, outcome uncertainty, incentives, and risk and (b) is an empirically valid perspective, particularly when coupled with complementary perspectives. The principal recommendation is to incorporate an agency perspective in studies of the many problems having a cooperative structure.

Notes and References

This item contains 69 references.

  • Anderson, E. (1985) The salesperson as outside agent of em- ployee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Science, 4, 234-254.
  • Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981) Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Econom- ics, 12, 605-616.
  • Argawal, A., & Mandelker, G. (1987) Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. Jour- nal of Finance, 42, 823-837.
  • Arrow, K. (1971) Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chi- cago: Markham.
  • Barnard, C. (1938) The functions of the executive. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Barney, J. (1988) Agency theory, employee stock ownership and a firm's cost of equity capital. Unpublished working paper, Texas A&M University, College Station.
  • Barney, J., & Ouchi, W. (Eds.) (1986) Organizational econom- ics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Basu, A., Lal, R., Srinivasan, V., & Staelin, R. (1985) Sales- force compensation plans: An agency theoretic perspec- tive. Marketing Science, 4, 267-291.
  • Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932) The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
  • Bolton, M. (1988) Organizational miming: When do late adopters of organizational innovations outperform pio- neers? Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
  • Burt, R. (1979) A structural theory of interlocking corporate directorates. Social Networks, 1, 415-435.
  • Capitalism in the making. (1984, April 30) Time, p. 62.
  • Chandler, A. (1962) Strategy and structure. New York: Dou- bleday.
  • Conlon, E., & Parks, J. (1988) The effects of monitoring and tradition on compensation arrangements: An experiment on principal/agent dyads. In F. Hoy (Ed.), Best papers pro- ceedings (pp. 191-195). Anaheim, CA: Academy of Man- agement.
  • Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • DeJong, D., Forsythe, R., & Uecker, W. (1985) Ripoffs, lemons and reputation formation in agency relationships: A lab- oratory market study. Journal of Finance, 50, 809-820.
  • Demski, J. (1980) A simple case of indeterminate financial reporting. Working paper, Stanford University.
  • Demski, J., & Feltham, G. (1978) Economic incentives in bud- getary control systems. Accounting Review, 53, 336-359.
  • Dornbusch, S., & Scott, W. R. (1974) Evaluation and the ex- ercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Eccles, R. (1985) Transfer pricing as a problem of agency. In J. Pratt & R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of business (pp. 151-186). Boston: Harvard Busi- ness School Press.
  • Eisenhardt, K. (1985) Control: Organizational and economic approaches. Management Science, 31, 134-149.
  • Eisenhardt, K. (1988) Agency and institutional explanations of compensation in retail sales. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 488-511.
  • Fama, E. (1980) Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983) Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
  • Galbraith, J. (1973) Designing complex organizations. Read- ing, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Gardner, W., & Martinko, M. (1988) Impression manage- ment: An observational study linking audience character- istics with verbal self-presentations. Academy of Manage- ment Journal, 31, 42-65.
  • Gausch, J., & Weiss, A. (1981) Self-selection in the labor mar- ket. American Economic Review, 71, 275-284.
  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1978) Some results on incentive con- tracts with application to education and employment, health insurance, and law enforcement. American Eco- nomic Review, 68, 20-30.
  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1979) Optimal incentive contracts with imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 231-259.
  • Hirsch, P., & Friedman, R. (1986) Collaboration or paradigm shift? Economic vs. behavioral thinking about policy? In J. Pearce & R. Robinson (Eds.), Best papers proceedings (pp. 31-35). Chicago: Academy of Management.
  • Hirsch, P., Michaels, S., & Friedman, R. (1987) "Dirty hands" versus "clean models": Is sociology in danger of being seduced by economics? Theory and Society, 317-336.
  • Holmstrom, B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
  • Jensen, M. (1983) Organization theory and methodology. Ac- counting Review, 56, 319-338.
  • Jensen, M. (1984) Takeovers: Folklore and science. Harvard Business Review, 62(6), 109-121.
  • Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976) Theory of the firm: Man- agerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
  • Jensen, M., & Roeback, R. (1983) The market for corporate control: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Econom- ics, 11, 5-50.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263- 291.
  • Kosnik, R. (1987) Greenmail: A study in board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 32, 163-185.
  • Lambert, R. (1983) Long-term contracts and moral hazard. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 441-452.
  • Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967) Organization and environ- ment. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
  • Leatherwood, M., & Conlon, E. (1987) Diffusibility of blame: Effects on persistence in a project. Academy of Manage- ment Journal, 30, 836-848.
  • MacCrimmon, K., & Wehrung, D. (1986) Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.
  • March, J. (1962) The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662-678.
  • March, J., & Shapira, Z. (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science, 33, 1404-1418.
  • March, J., & Simon, H. (1958) Organizations. New York: Wiley.
  • McGrath, J., Martin, J., & Kukla, R. (1982) Judgment calls in research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Meet Mike Jensen, the professor of merger mania. (1988, February 8) Business Week, pp. 66-67.
  • Mitnick, B. (1986) The theory of agency and organizational analysis. Unpublished working paper, University of Pitts- burgh.
  • Ouchi, W. (1979) A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci- ence, 25, 833-848.
  • Pearce, J., Stevenson, W., & Perry, J. (1985) Managerial com- pensation based on organizational performance: A time series analysis of the effects of merit pay. Academy of Management journal, 28, 261-278.
  • Perrow, C. (1986) Complex organizations. New York: Ran- dom House.
  • Pettigrew, A. (1973) The politics of organizational decision making. London: Tavistock.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981) Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitt- man.
  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1974) Organizational decision making as a political process: The case of a university budget. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 135-151.
  • Ross, S. (1973) The economic theory of agency: The princi- pal's problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134-139.
  • Shavell, S. (1979) Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 53- 73.
  • Singh, H., & Harianto, F. (in press) Management-board re- lationships, takeover risk and the adoption of golden para- chutes: An empirical investigation. Academy of Manage- ment Journal.
  • Sitkin, S. (1987) Secrecy in organizations: The limits of legit- imate information control. Working paper, University of Texas, Austin.
  • Spence, A. M. (1975) The economics of internal organization: An introduction. Bell Journal of Economics, 6, 163-172.
  • Spence, A. M., & Zeckhauser, R. (1971) Insurance, informa- tion, and individual action. American Economic Review, 61, 380-387.
  • Thompson, J. (1967) Organizations in action. New York: Mc- Graw-Hill.
  • Ungson, G., & Steers, R. (1984) Motivation and politics in executive compensation. Academy of Management Re- view, 9, 313-323.
  • Walker, G., & Weber, D. (1984) A transaction cost approach to make-or-buy decisions. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 29, 373-391.
  • Walking, R., & Long, M. (1984) Agency theory, managerial welfare, and takeover bid resistance. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 54-68.
  • White, H. (1985) Agency as control. In J. Pratt & R. Zeck- hauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of busi- ness (pp. 187-214). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Williamson, 0. (1975) Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
  • Wilson, R. (1968) On the theory of syndicates. Econometrica, 36, 119-132.
  • Wolfson, M. (1985) Empirical evidence of incentive problems and their mitigation in oil and gas shelter programs. In J. Pratt & R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of business (pp. 101-126). Boston: Harvard Busi- ness School Press.
  • Zenger, T. (1988) Agency sorting, agent solutions and disecon- omies of scale: An empirical investigation of employment contracts in high technology R&D. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.