1. Despite the profusion of Lepidoptera and other potential hosts in the tropics, the Ichneumonidae are not more species-rich in the lowland tropics than in temperate communities. Alternate but partially complementary hypotheses emphasizing resource fragmentation, predation, or chemical defence have been proposed to explain this paradox. 2. Because different diversity gradients occur in the various subgroups of the Ichneumonidae, as well as among their hosts, general explanations are unlikely to account for this `anomalous diversity.' Hypotheses of ecological causation are best tested at the taxonomic level where the pattern of interest applies. 3. Phylogenetic trends in the distribution, abundance, and palatability of butterflies (Papilionoidea), a group that increases dramatically in species richness towards the tropics, are presented as a case study for evaluating hypotheses of parasitoid species richness. Evidence is presented that supports the `nasty host hypothesis' as an explanation for the lack of diversity of associated parasitoids. 4. An examination of hypotheses and the approaches used to test them suggests that the nasty-host hypothesis is best supported by the limited evidence available, while evidence in favour of other hypotheses is either lacking or ambiguous. In particular, use of the koinobiont/idiobiont dichotomy and parasitoid assemblage-size comparisons may result in contradictory conclusions.
Founded in 1932, Journal of Animal Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of animal ecology; specifically those that make substantial contributions to our understanding of animal ecology as well as offering insights into issues of general interest to ecologists. This includes reviews that shed light on subjects central to animal ecology, including theoretical analyses of specific topics. The Journal publishes standard papers, essay reviews, forum pieces and In Focus articles (by invitation). The journal is published six times a year. Further details are available at www.journalofanimalecology.org. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of The Journal of Animal Ecology. The electronic version of The Journal of Animal Ecology is available at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117960113/home. Authorised users may be able to access the full text articles at this site.
The British Ecological Society is a welcoming and inclusive home for everyone interested in ecology. The Society was established in 1913 and has over 6,000 members worldwide, bringing people together across regional, national and global scales to advance ecological science. The BES's many activities include the publication of a range of scientific literature, including seven internationally renowned journals, the organisation and sponsorship of a wide variety of meetings, the funding of numerous grant schemes, education work and policy work.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Journal of Animal Ecology
© 1998 British Ecological Society