You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Where Do Research Problems Come From?
Lewis R. Binford
Vol. 66, No. 4 (Oct., 2001), pp. 669-678
Published by: Society for American Archaeology
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694179
Page Count: 10
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Archaeological paradigms, Archaeology, Observational research, Anthropology, Behavioral archaeology, Paleoanthropology, Cultural anthropology, Archaeological surveys, Archaeological sites, Stone tools
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
In science, understanding the relationship between data and problems is crucial to successful research. When problems are imposed on the data and its organization-instead of addressing the empirical subject matter of the discipline-a major epistemological difficulty arises. What domains of knowledge can reliably inform about the imposed problem? I suggest that the many claims that all data are "theory dependent" are primarily accurate in those instances when a problem is imposed on a body of data. This is the approach of humanities. When a problem is recognized in the context of pattern recognition studies that are focused on data generated from the study of one's subject matter, a different relationship exists between data and theory and fruitful theory building becomes possible. The latter is the approach of science. Central to this contrast is the issue of where problems come from.
American Antiquity © 2001 Society for American Archaeology