You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Economic Reforms and Urban Development in China
Wen H. Kuo
Vol. 62, No. 2 (Summer, 1989), pp. 188-203
Published by: Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2760578
Page Count: 16
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Cities, Urban development, Capital investments, City planning, Financial investments, Economic reform, Municipal governments, Economic development, Population growth, Public works
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
China's urban policy-makers have recently experienced mounting social presures to improve their urban conditions. This paper argues that some of the urban development problems confronted by economic reformers originated in the Stalinist model of economic development instituted in prereform years. Overstress on the development of heavy industry and a centralized economic planning system deprived the cities of organizational structures which would have enabled them to achieve sound urban development. The economic reforms of recent years have initiated some urban-organization and policy changes. However, the pace and magnitude of change among cities varies, as does their ability to resolve their existing urban underdevelopment problems. Analysis reveals Chinese urban policy-makers are still reacting mainly to social pressures resulting from economic growth. The service needs of the cities do not seem to have played a significant role in the data insofar as the allocation of urban capital investment funds and the improvement or urban services are concerned.
Pacific Affairs © 1989 Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia