You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change
Joseph R. Gusfield
American Journal of Sociology
Vol. 72, No. 4 (Jan., 1967), pp. 351-362
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2775860
Page Count: 12
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Traditions, Economic growth, Social change, Indian culture, Economic development, Hindus, Indian literature, Villages, Cultural values, Political power
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
"Tradition" and "modernity" are widely used as polar opposites in a linear theory of social change. This theory is examined in the light of Indian and other materials on development. Seven fallacies in this contrast usage are presented. It is incorrect to view traditional societies as static, normatively consist, or structurally homogeneous. The relations between the traditional and the modern do not necessarily involve idsplacement, conflict, or exclusiveness. Modernity does not necessarily weaken tradition. Both tradition and modernity form the bases of ideologies and movements in which the polar opposites are converted into aspirations, but traditional forms may supply support for, as well as against, change.
American Journal of Sociology © 1967 The University of Chicago Press