The United Nations has targeted Santa Maria volcano, Guatemala, as part of its multidisciplinary "Decade Volcano" program to mitigate volcanic hazards. As part of this program to spotlight one of the world's most dangerous volcanoes, and on the basis of paleomagnetic data, we represent a wholly new interpretation of the temporal evolution of the Santa María volcano. Santa María is a typical, moderate-sized ($10 km^{3}$), basaltic-andesite stratovolcano. In 1902, a catastrophic Plinian eruption produced a crater in the south flank of the volcano exposing 250 m of interbedded lava flows, laharic material, and pyroclastic deposits comprising approximately 40% of the cone's infrastructure. A reanalysis of 25 block samples collected by Rose and co-workers and analysis of 48 cores from eight newly sampled lava flows reconfirms and refines the geomagnetic excursion. The resulting geomagnetic waveform is strongly correlatable with that of the 25 to 28 ka Mono Lake excursion. By inference, the latter 40% of the cone's volume ($4 km^{3}$) was emplaced in a 1000-3000 yr period with cone construction ending about 25 ka. The corresponding volcanic flux rate ranges from $0.13 m^{3}/s to 0.04 m^{3}/s$; a range similar to young, active stratovolcanoes along the Central American arc. Extrapolating a flux of $0.13 m^{3}/s to 0.04 m^{3}/s$ throughout the entire construction of Santa Maria suggests that cone growth began between 27.5-32.5 ka. However, up to $20 km^{3}$ of dacite tephra was ejected in the 1902 Plinian eruption, suggesting that the magma system feeding Santa Maria remained active during the past 25,000 yr. Assuming a geologically reasonable, constant flux rate of $0.13 m^{3}/s$, a cumulative volume of nearly $100 km^{3}$ of magma could have been stored in the magma chamber)s) beneath Santa Maria. Because only $20 km^{3}$ of magma was erupted in 1902, as much as $80 km^{3}$ of magma, or its solidified complement, remains in situ in the crust. Thus the growth of even a moderate-sized volcano in Central America is complemented by voluminous intrusion of magma into the crust.
Current issues are now on the Chicago Journals website. Read the latest issue.One of the oldest journals in geology, The Journal of Geology (JG) has since 1893 promoted the systematic philosophical and fundamental study of geology. JG publishes original research across a broad range of subfields in geology, including geophysics, geochemistry, sedimentology, geomorphology, petrology, plate tectonics, volcanology, structural geology, mineralogy, and planetary sciences. Many of its articles have wide appeal for geologists, present research of topical relevance, and offer new geological insights through the application of innovative approaches and methods.
Since its origins in 1890 as one of the three main divisions of the University of Chicago, The University of Chicago Press has embraced as its mission the obligation to disseminate scholarship of the highest standard and to publish serious works that promote education, foster public understanding, and enrich cultural life. Today, the Journals Division publishes more than 70 journals and hardcover serials, in a wide range of academic disciplines, including the social sciences, the humanities, education, the biological and medical sciences, and the physical sciences.
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
The Journal of Geology
© 1994 The University of Chicago Press