This article uses two measures of state party ideology-a 1994 survey of state party committee members and a content analysis of state party platforms between 1990 and 1996-to determine variation between states in interparty ideological differences. These interparty ideological differences are compared to David Mayhew's scale measuring the historical presence of traditional party organizations in the American states. As hypothesized, there is a strong tendency for states with histories of traditional party organization to have less ideologically polarized parties than those states without such traditions. This association holds up when we control for state-level measures of education, income, mass polarization, electoral competition, and party control. State environments that historically encouraged or discouraged the formation of traditional party organizations help explain variation in patterns of party activism in the contemporary era.
Political Research Quarterly (PRQ) is a refereed scholarly journal publishing original research in all areas of political science. PRQ is published by the University of Utah and is the official journal of the Western Political Science Association. Most issues also feature field essays integrating and summarizing current knowledge in particular research areas. PRQ is published in March, June, September, and December.
Sara Miller McCune founded SAGE Publishing in 1965 to support the dissemination of usable knowledge and educate a global community. SAGE is a leading international provider of innovative, high-quality content publishing more than 900 journals and over 800 new books each year, spanning a wide range of subject areas. A growing selection of library products includes archives, data, case studies and video. SAGE remains majority owned by our founder and after her lifetime will become owned by a charitable trust that secures the company’s continued independence. Principal offices are located in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC and Melbourne. www.sagepublishing.com
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Political Research Quarterly
© 1998 Sage Publications, Inc.