You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Consumer Involvement and Deception from Implied Advertising Claims
Gita Venkataramani Johar
Journal of Marketing Research
Vol. 32, No. 3 (Aug., 1995), pp. 267-279
Published by: American Marketing Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151980
Page Count: 13
You can always find the topics here!Topics: False advertising, Optical media, Advertising research, Deceptive advertising, Brands, Inference, Word of mouth advertising, Consumer research, Marketing, Memory
Were these topics helpful?See something inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
Results from Experiment 1 reveal that consumers highly involved in processing an advertisement are likely to make invalid inferences from incomplete-comparison claims at the time of processing and, hence, be deceived. Less involved consumers may be induced to complete such claims at the time of measurement, which makes it appear that they also were deceived by the advertisement. Experiment 2 then demonstrates that deception depends on the processing demands of the advertising claim. Only less involved consumers are deceived by inconspicuous-qualification claims, which require detailed processing of the advertisement for non-deception. The author discusses the implications of these findings for advertisers and public policy.
Journal of Marketing Research © 1995 American Marketing Association