You are not currently logged in.
Access JSTOR through your library or other institution:
If You Use a Screen ReaderThis content is available through Read Online (Free) program, which relies on page scans. Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Water Relations, Shoot and Root Architecture, and Phenology of Three Co-Occurring Banksia Species: No Evidence for Niche Differentiation in the Pattern of Water Use
Byron B. Lamont and Stephen M. Bergl
Vol. 60, No. 3 (Apr., 1991), pp. 291-298
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3545070
Page Count: 8
You can always find the topics here!Topics: Species, Plants, Plant roots, Soil water, Water consumption, Root systems, Seedlings, Architecture, Vegetation canopies, Synecology
Were these topics helpful?See somethings inaccurate? Let us know!
Select the topics that are inaccurate.
Since scans are not currently available to screen readers, please contact JSTOR User Support for access. We'll provide a PDF copy for your screen reader.
Preview not available
The niches of three co-dominant Banksia shrub species were determined by examining their water relations, architecture and vegetative phenology. Dawn and dusk xylem pressure potentials were similar in the three species, decreasing almost three fold from early summer to mid-autumn. All species showed similar daily patterns of stomatal conductance. Peak conductances decreased almost three fold over the summer period, corresponding with increased aerial and edaphic water deficits. The horizontal and vertical root patterns were similar, providing equal access to soil-stored water, with much intermingling of root systems. Vegetative growth of the three species occurred almost exclusively in summer even though surface root growth was restricted to winter-spring. Despite marked differences in life history and leaf sizes, no variations in water use patterns that might promote co-existence of the three species were evident. It is concluded that co-occurrence of these species cannot be attributed to their differential partitioning of this apparently limiting resource.
Oikos © 1991 Nordic Society Oikos